Rohan valication

仿真結果:DR=54Mbps,BR=6Mbps:

Trial 1 of 1; 54 Mb/s for 5 nodes

Node 0; throughput 5.3573

Node 1; throughput 5.3664

Node 2; throughput 5.3204

Node 3; throughput 5.2007

Node 4; throughput 5.3432

Total throughput 26.588

26.588Trial 1 of 1; 6 Mb/s for 10 nodes

Node 0; throughput 2.4847

Node 1; throughput 2.6194

Node 2; throughput 2.4924

Node 3; throughput 2.4366

Node 4; throughput 2.3828

Node 5; throughput 2.5181

Node 6; throughput 2.4636

Node 7; throughput 2.4914

Node 8; throughput 2.4965

Node 9; throughput 2.3762

Total throughput 24.7617

24.7617Trial 1 of 1; 6 Mb/s for 15 nodes

Node 0; throughput 1.5917

Node 1; throughput 1.5589

Node 2; throughput 1.5814

Node 3; throughput 1.5304

Node 4; throughput 1.5982

Node 5; throughput 1.5618

Node 6; throughput 1.5892

Node 7; throughput 1.5667

Node 8; throughput 1.541

Node 9; throughput 1.6565

Node 10; throughput 1.5329

Node 11; throughput 1.5202

Node 12; throughput 1.5757

Node 13; throughput 1.5698

Node 14; throughput 1.5884

Total throughput 23.5628

23.5628Trial 1 of 1; 6 Mb/s for 20 nodes

Node 0; throughput 1.0946

Node 1; throughput 1.13

Node 2; throughput 1.1452

Node 3; throughput 1.1507

Node 4; throughput 1.118

Node 5; throughput 1.2081

Node 6; throughput 1.1334

Node 7; throughput 1.0604

Node 8; throughput 1.1091

Node 9; throughput 1.143

Node 10; throughput 1.0913

Node 11; throughput 1.1917

Node 12; throughput 1.1484

Node 13; throughput 1.1296

Node 14; throughput 1.1264

Node 15; throughput 1.1639

Node 16; throughput 1.121

Node 17; throughput 1.1425

Node 18; throughput 1.117

Node 19; throughput 1.1489

Total throughput 22.6732

22.6732Trial 1 of 1; 6 Mb/s for 25 nodes

Node 0; throughput 0.9108

Node 1; throughput 0.8282

Node 2; throughput 0.8809

Node 3; throughput 0.9162

Node 4; throughput 0.8426

Node 5; throughput 0.8639

Node 6; throughput 0.8748

Node 7; throughput 0.9118

Node 8; throughput 0.885

Node 9; throughput 0.8666

Node 10; throughput 0.849

Node 11; throughput 0.9566

Node 12; throughput 0.8416

Node 13; throughput 0.8464

Node 14; throughput 0.8932

Node 15; throughput 0.8615

Node 16; throughput 0.9113

Node 17; throughput 0.8646

Node 18; throughput 0.8797

Node 19; throughput 0.8895

Node 20; throughput 0.7972

Node 21; throughput 0.8644

Node 22; throughput 0.8836

Node 23; throughput 0.9408

Node 24; throughput 0.8831

Total throughput 21.9433

21.9433Trial 1 of 1; 6 Mb/s for 30 nodes

Node 0; throughput 0.6793

Node 1; throughput 0.7152

Node 2; throughput 0.6627

Node 3; throughput 0.7158

Node 4; throughput 0.7433

Node 5; throughput 0.7024

Node 6; throughput 0.7395

Node 7; throughput 0.723

Node 8; throughput 0.7274

Node 9; throughput 0.7505

Node 10; throughput 0.7004

Node 11; throughput 0.7271

Node 12; throughput 0.698

Node 13; throughput 0.7099

Node 14; throughput 0.7025

Node 15; throughput 0.6825

Node 16; throughput 0.7274

Node 17; throughput 0.6863

Node 18; throughput 0.7391

Node 19; throughput 0.7347

Node 20; throughput 0.6983

Node 21; throughput 0.7325

Node 22; throughput 0.7077

Node 23; throughput 0.629

Node 24; throughput 0.7513

Node 25; throughput 0.7022

Node 26; throughput 0.716

Node 27; throughput 0.704

Node 28; throughput 0.6787

Node 29; throughput 0.7311

Total throughput 21.3178

21.3178Trial 1 of 1; 6 Mb/s for 35 nodes

Node 0; throughput 0.5891

Node 1; throughput 0.6155

Node 2; throughput 0.6167

Node 3; throughput 0.6137

Node 4; throughput 0.5809

Node 5; throughput 0.6066

Node 6; throughput 0.614

Node 7; throughput 0.5503

Node 8; throughput 0.6198

Node 9; throughput 0.583

Node 10; throughput 0.597

Node 11; throughput 0.58

Node 12; throughput 0.5761

Node 13; throughput 0.5709

Node 14; throughput 0.5981

Node 15; throughput 0.6011

Node 16; throughput 0.5834

Node 17; throughput 0.5703

Node 18; throughput 0.5895

Node 19; throughput 0.6068

Node 20; throughput 0.598

Node 21; throughput 0.5856

Node 22; throughput 0.6006

Node 23; throughput 0.5979

Node 24; throughput 0.5529

Node 25; throughput 0.5953

Node 26; throughput 0.613

Node 27; throughput 0.5788

Node 28; throughput 0.6277

Node 29; throughput 0.5967

Node 30; throughput 0.5806

Node 31; throughput 0.5623

Node 32; throughput 0.6145

Node 33; throughput 0.571

Node 34; throughput 0.6187

Total throughput 20.7564

20.7564Trial 1 of 1; 6 Mb/s for 40 nodes

Node 0; throughput 0.5219

Node 1; throughput 0.4962

Node 2; throughput 0.5349

Node 3; throughput 0.5299

Node 4; throughput 0.5059

Node 5; throughput 0.5063

Node 6; throughput 0.5423

Node 7; throughput 0.5205

Node 8; throughput 0.4978

Node 9; throughput 0.4844

Node 10; throughput 0.4692

Node 11; throughput 0.4792

Node 12; throughput 0.5656

Node 13; throughput 0.491

Node 14; throughput 0.5161

Node 15; throughput 0.497

Node 16; throughput 0.46

Node 17; throughput 0.4878

Node 18; throughput 0.5138

Node 19; throughput 0.4981

Node 20; throughput 0.5108

Node 21; throughput 0.4896

Node 22; throughput 0.5145

Node 23; throughput 0.4858

Node 24; throughput 0.5172

Node 25; throughput 0.4782

Node 26; throughput 0.492

Node 27; throughput 0.5237

Node 28; throughput 0.5209

Node 29; throughput 0.5524

Node 30; throughput 0.47

Node 31; throughput 0.4723

Node 32; throughput 0.5308

Node 33; throughput 0.4829

Node 34; throughput 0.4969

Node 35; throughput 0.4715

Node 36; throughput 0.5478

Node 37; throughput 0.5417

Node 38; throughput 0.5216

Node 39; throughput 0.512

Total throughput 20.2505

20.2505Trial 1 of 1; 6 Mb/s for 45 nodes

Node 0; throughput 0.4665

Node 1; throughput 0.4603

Node 2; throughput 0.3984

Node 3; throughput 0.4559

Node 4; throughput 0.4487

Node 5; throughput 0.4425

Node 6; throughput 0.4445

Node 7; throughput 0.4421

Node 8; throughput 0.4351

Node 9; throughput 0.4426

Node 10; throughput 0.4437

Node 11; throughput 0.4518

Node 12; throughput 0.4212

Node 13; throughput 0.427

Node 14; throughput 0.4325

Node 15; throughput 0.4798

Node 16; throughput 0.4157

Node 17; throughput 0.4302

Node 18; throughput 0.4326

Node 19; throughput 0.4661

Node 20; throughput 0.4778

Node 21; throughput 0.4497

Node 22; throughput 0.4767

Node 23; throughput 0.4583

Node 24; throughput 0.4479

Node 25; throughput 0.4068

Node 26; throughput 0.4302

Node 27; throughput 0.4616

Node 28; throughput 0.451

Node 29; throughput 0.4222

Node 30; throughput 0.4283

Node 31; throughput 0.4249

Node 32; throughput 0.4609

Node 33; throughput 0.4071

Node 34; throughput 0.4435

Node 35; throughput 0.4441

Node 36; throughput 0.4158

Node 37; throughput 0.4502

Node 38; throughput 0.4034

Node 39; throughput 0.4577

Node 40; throughput 0.4357

Node 41; throughput 0.4286

Node 42; throughput 0.4227

Node 43; throughput 0.4418

Node 44; throughput 0.4084

Total throughput 19.7925

19.7925Trial 1 of 1; 6 Mb/s for 50 nodes

Node 0; throughput 0.4002

Node 1; throughput 0.3782

Node 2; throughput 0.3665

Node 3; throughput 0.4102

Node 4; throughput 0.3826

Node 5; throughput 0.4205

Node 6; throughput 0.3819

Node 7; throughput 0.4005

Node 8; throughput 0.3946

Node 9; throughput 0.3875

Node 10; throughput 0.3683

Node 11; throughput 0.3687

Node 12; throughput 0.3929

Node 13; throughput 0.3824

Node 14; throughput 0.3966

Node 15; throughput 0.3616

Node 16; throughput 0.3797

Node 17; throughput 0.4051

Node 18; throughput 0.3915

Node 19; throughput 0.3741

Node 20; throughput 0.3915

Node 21; throughput 0.3683

Node 22; throughput 0.3725

Node 23; throughput 0.3853

Node 24; throughput 0.3778

Node 25; throughput 0.3787

Node 26; throughput 0.4097

Node 27; throughput 0.369

Node 28; throughput 0.3836

Node 29; throughput 0.4359

Node 30; throughput 0.41

Node 31; throughput 0.3884

Node 32; throughput 0.3985

Node 33; throughput 0.3801

Node 34; throughput 0.3945

Node 35; throughput 0.3915

Node 36; throughput 0.3791

Node 37; throughput 0.3778

Node 38; throughput 0.4133

Node 39; throughput 0.4054

Node 40; throughput 0.3995

Node 41; throughput 0.3613

Node 42; throughput 0.3718

Node 43; throughput 0.3701

Node 44; throughput 0.3918

Node 45; throughput 0.3741

Node 46; throughput 0.4039

Node 47; throughput 0.3822

Node 48; throughput 0.3842

Node 49; throughput 0.373

Total throughput 19.3664

19.3664

最后編輯于
?著作權歸作者所有,轉載或內容合作請聯系作者
平臺聲明:文章內容(如有圖片或視頻亦包括在內)由作者上傳并發布,文章內容僅代表作者本人觀點,簡書系信息發布平臺,僅提供信息存儲服務。
  • 序言:七十年代末,一起剝皮案震驚了整個濱河市,隨后出現的幾起案子,更是在濱河造成了極大的恐慌,老刑警劉巖,帶你破解...
    沈念sama閱讀 228,983評論 6 537
  • 序言:濱河連續發生了三起死亡事件,死亡現場離奇詭異,居然都是意外死亡,警方通過查閱死者的電腦和手機,發現死者居然都...
    沈念sama閱讀 98,772評論 3 422
  • 文/潘曉璐 我一進店門,熙熙樓的掌柜王于貴愁眉苦臉地迎上來,“玉大人,你說我怎么就攤上這事?!?“怎么了?”我有些...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 176,947評論 0 381
  • 文/不壞的土叔 我叫張陵,是天一觀的道長。 經常有香客問我,道長,這世上最難降的妖魔是什么? 我笑而不...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 63,201評論 1 315
  • 正文 為了忘掉前任,我火速辦了婚禮,結果婚禮上,老公的妹妹穿的比我還像新娘。我一直安慰自己,他們只是感情好,可當我...
    茶點故事閱讀 71,960評論 6 410
  • 文/花漫 我一把揭開白布。 她就那樣靜靜地躺著,像睡著了一般。 火紅的嫁衣襯著肌膚如雪。 梳的紋絲不亂的頭發上,一...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 55,350評論 1 324
  • 那天,我揣著相機與錄音,去河邊找鬼。 笑死,一個胖子當著我的面吹牛,可吹牛的內容都是我干的。 我是一名探鬼主播,決...
    沈念sama閱讀 43,406評論 3 444
  • 文/蒼蘭香墨 我猛地睜開眼,長吁一口氣:“原來是場噩夢啊……” “哼!你這毒婦竟也來了?” 一聲冷哼從身側響起,我...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 42,549評論 0 289
  • 序言:老撾萬榮一對情侶失蹤,失蹤者是張志新(化名)和其女友劉穎,沒想到半個月后,有當地人在樹林里發現了一具尸體,經...
    沈念sama閱讀 49,104評論 1 335
  • 正文 獨居荒郊野嶺守林人離奇死亡,尸身上長有42處帶血的膿包…… 初始之章·張勛 以下內容為張勛視角 年9月15日...
    茶點故事閱讀 40,914評論 3 356
  • 正文 我和宋清朗相戀三年,在試婚紗的時候發現自己被綠了。 大學時的朋友給我發了我未婚夫和他白月光在一起吃飯的照片。...
    茶點故事閱讀 43,089評論 1 371
  • 序言:一個原本活蹦亂跳的男人離奇死亡,死狀恐怖,靈堂內的尸體忽然破棺而出,到底是詐尸還是另有隱情,我是刑警寧澤,帶...
    沈念sama閱讀 38,647評論 5 362
  • 正文 年R本政府宣布,位于F島的核電站,受9級特大地震影響,放射性物質發生泄漏。R本人自食惡果不足惜,卻給世界環境...
    茶點故事閱讀 44,340評論 3 347
  • 文/蒙蒙 一、第九天 我趴在偏房一處隱蔽的房頂上張望。 院中可真熱鬧,春花似錦、人聲如沸。這莊子的主人今日做“春日...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 34,753評論 0 28
  • 文/蒼蘭香墨 我抬頭看了看天上的太陽。三九已至,卻和暖如春,著一層夾襖步出監牢的瞬間,已是汗流浹背。 一陣腳步聲響...
    開封第一講書人閱讀 36,007評論 1 289
  • 我被黑心中介騙來泰國打工, 沒想到剛下飛機就差點兒被人妖公主榨干…… 1. 我叫王不留,地道東北人。 一個月前我還...
    沈念sama閱讀 51,834評論 3 395
  • 正文 我出身青樓,卻偏偏與公主長得像,于是被迫代替她去往敵國和親。 傳聞我的和親對象是個殘疾皇子,可洞房花燭夜當晚...
    茶點故事閱讀 48,106評論 2 375

推薦閱讀更多精彩內容