KVC 的發現

廢話不多收,直接上代碼 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??

.m文件

#import"Object.h"

@interfaceObject()

{

NSString*_objectStr_M;

NSDictionary*_objectDic_M;

NSNumber*_objectNum_M;

}

@property(nonatomic,strong)NSString*objectStr_propertyM;

@property(nonatomic,strong)NSDictionary*objectDic_propertyM;

@property(nonatomic,strong)NSNumber*objectNum_propertyM;

@end

@implementationObject

{

NSString*objectStr_implementation;

NSDictionary*objectDic_implementation;

NSNumber*objectNum_M;

}

-(instancetype)init

{

self=[superinit];

if(self) {

_objectNum_M=@2;

objectNum_M=@1;

objectStr_implementation=@"objectStr_implementation";

_objectStr_M=@"_objectStr_M";

_objectStr_h=@"_objectStr_h";

_objectStr_propertyh=@"__objectStr_propertyh";

_objectStr_propertyM=@"__objectStr_propertyM";

}

returnself;

}


.h文件

@interfaceObject :NSObject

{

NSString*_objectStr_h;

NSDictionary*_objectDic_h;

NSNumber*_objectNum_h;

}

@property(nonatomic,strong)NSString*objectStr_propertyh;

@property(nonatomic,strong)NSDictionary *objectDic_propertyh;

@property(nonatomic,strong)NSNumber*objectNum_propertyh;

@end



測試代碼:

Object*obj=[[Objectalloc]init];

if([objvalueForKey:@"_objectNum_M"])

NSLog(@"_objectNum_M is ______%@",[obj valueForKey:@"_objectNum_M"]);

if([objvalueForKey:@"objectNum_M"])

NSLog(@"objectNum_M is *******%@",[obj valueForKey:@"objectNum_M"]);

if([objvalueForKey:@"_objectStr_M"])

NSLog(@"_objectStr_M is %@",[obj valueForKey:@"_objectStr_M"]);

if([objvalueForKey:@"_objectStr_h"])

NSLog(@"_objectStr_h is %@",[obj valueForKey:@"_objectStr_h"]);

if([objvalueForKey:@"_objectStr_propertyh"])

NSLog(@"_objectStr_propertyh is %@",[obj valueForKey:@"_objectStr_propertyh"]);

if([objvalueForKey:@"_objectStr_propertyM"])

NSLog(@"_objectStr_propertyM is %@",[obj valueForKey:@"_objectStr_propertyM"]);


打印結果:

2016-09-08 23:17:17.759 PopMenu[2743:737039] _objectNum_M is ______2

2016-09-08 23:17:17.759 PopMenu[2743:737039] objectNum_M is *******2

2016-09-08 23:17:17.760 PopMenu[2743:737039] _objectStr_M is _objectStr_M

2016-09-08 23:17:17.760 PopMenu[2743:737039] _objectStr_h is _objectStr_h

2016-09-08 23:17:17.760 PopMenu[2743:737039] _objectStr_propertyh is __objectStr_propertyh

2016-09-08 23:17:17.760 PopMenu[2743:737039] _objectStr_propertyM is __objectStr_propertyM

可是這兩句出了問題

2016-09-08 23:17:17.759 PopMenu[2743:737039] _objectNum_M is ______2

2016-09-08 23:17:17.759 PopMenu[2743:737039] objectNum_M is *******2

一開始猜想是_objectNum_M?系統認為是同一變量,但編譯器不報錯,于是加了一句

這就證明 KVC可以獲取所有成員變量和屬性的指針

if([objvalueForKey:@"objectStr_implementation"])

NSLog(@"objectStr_implementation is %@",[objvalueForKey:@"objectStr_implementation"]);

發現 ? ???2016-09-08 23:17:17.759 PopMenu[2743:737039] objectStr_implementation is objectStr_implementation

猜想錯誤,于是又猜 系統認為_objectNum_M ,objectNum_M是同一變量,于是交換_objectNum_M,objectNum_M? 在+(void)init方法里的賦值順序,結果還是一樣,于是又猜,可能是 _objectNum_M 聲明interfaceObject(),objectNum_M? 聲明在implementationObject里面,優先級不一樣,可是結果還是一樣,這就證明系統在kvc取值時,_XXX 變量 優先級>XXX 變量。這個測試還證明了KVC 權限很高,可以取所有成員和屬性的指針。如果用下面這種方式聲名,則不能訪問:

最后編輯于
?著作權歸作者所有,轉載或內容合作請聯系作者
平臺聲明:文章內容(如有圖片或視頻亦包括在內)由作者上傳并發布,文章內容僅代表作者本人觀點,簡書系信息發布平臺,僅提供信息存儲服務。

推薦閱讀更多精彩內容