這個(gè)問(wèn)題網(wǎng)上的文章實(shí)在是太多,我就大概介紹一下就好了。先看一下循環(huán)引用的例子:
@interface VC2 ()
@property (nonatomic, strong) void (^block) (void);
@end
@implementation VC
- (void)viewDidLoad {
[super viewDidLoad];
// Do any additional setup after loading the view.
self.block = ^{
NSLog(@"%@",self);
};
}
- (void)dealloc {
NSLog(@"vc釋放了");
}
上面的VC2是從前面push進(jìn)來(lái)的,當(dāng)pop出去的時(shí)候,dealloc方法并沒(méi)有被調(diào)用,說(shuō)明上面的block導(dǎo)致了循環(huán)引用。
下面我們?cè)賮?lái)看看破解循環(huán)引用的方法:就是在block要捕獲的對(duì)象的前面加一個(gè)修飾符_weak.
- (void)viewDidLoad {
[super viewDidLoad];
// Do any additional setup after loading the view.
__weak typeof(self) weakSelf = self;
self.block = ^{
NSLog(@"%@",weakSelf);
};
}
改為上面的寫(xiě)法之后,VC2在pop出去的時(shí)候,dealloc被調(diào)用了,這說(shuō)明循環(huán)引用已經(jīng)被打破了。下面用一張圖解釋一下上面的兩種情況。
有時(shí)候,我們?cè)诙嗑€程的操作中,會(huì)遇到weakSelf被提前釋放:
- (void)viewDidLoad {
[super viewDidLoad];
// Do any additional setup after loading the view.
__weak typeof(self) weakSelf = self;
self.block = ^{
dispatch_async(dispatch_get_main_queue(), ^{
[weakSelf doSomething];
});
};
}
- (void)viewDidDisappear:(BOOL)animated {
[super viewDidDisappear:animated];
self.block();
}
- (void)doSomething {
NSLog(@"一些存儲(chǔ)工作");
}
- (void)dealloc {
NSLog(@"vc釋放了");
}
我們發(fā)現(xiàn)doSomething函數(shù)并沒(méi)有被調(diào)用,說(shuō)明weakSelf被提前釋放掉了,我們加個(gè)打印測(cè)試一下:
- (void)viewDidLoad {
[super viewDidLoad];
// Do any additional setup after loading the view.
__weak typeof(self) weakSelf = self;
self.block = ^{
NSLog(@"weakSelf1 = %@",weakSelf);
dispatch_async(dispatch_get_main_queue(), ^{
NSLog(@"weakSelf2 = %@",weakSelf);
[weakSelf doSomething];
});
};
}
打印結(jié)果如下
**2016-09-23 14:58:19.851289 BlockTest5[1726:654191] weakSelf1 = <VC2: 0x100316360>**
**2016-09-23 14:58:19.852054 BlockTest5[1726:654191] vc****釋放了**
**2016-09-23 14:58:19.854404 BlockTest5[1726:654191] weakSelf2 = (null)**
從打印結(jié)果可以發(fā)現(xiàn),doSomething函數(shù)是在dealloc函數(shù)被調(diào)用之后調(diào)用的,這個(gè)時(shí)候weakSelf肯定已經(jīng)被釋放了,所以doSomething函數(shù)不可能被調(diào)用。為了避免這種情況,我們需要在block里面再?gòu)?qiáng)引用一次weakSelf,修改代碼如下:
- (void)viewDidLoad {
[super viewDidLoad];
// Do any additional setup after loading the view.
__weak typeof(self) weakSelf = self;
self.block = ^{
NSLog(@"weakSelf1 = %@",weakSelf);
__strong typeof(self) stongSelf = weakSelf;
dispatch_async(dispatch_get_main_queue(), ^{
NSLog(@"weakSelf2 = %@",stongSelf);
[stongSelf doSomething];
});
};
}
打印結(jié)果如下:
**2016-09-23 15:03:57.843134 BlockTest5[1734:655722] weakSelf1 = <VC2: 0x1003135b0>**
**2016-09-23 15:03:57.844858 BlockTest5[1734:655722] weakSelf2 = <VC2: 0x1003135b0>**
**2016-09-23 15:03:57.845021 BlockTest5[1734:655722] ****一些存儲(chǔ)工作**
**2016-09-23 15:03:57.845108 BlockTest5[1734:655722] vc****釋放了**
從打印結(jié)果可以看出,doSomething函數(shù)是在dealloc函數(shù)調(diào)用之前調(diào)用的,所以可以正常調(diào)用。
哪些情況不需要考慮循環(huán)引用
- (void)viewDidLoad {
[super viewDidLoad];
[UIView animateWithDuration:0.25 animations:^{
self.view.alpha = 0.5;
}];
dispatch_async(dispatch_get_main_queue(), ^{
NSLog(@"self = %@",self);
});
}
上面兩種block是我們最常用的,在VC2 pop出去之后,dealloc正常調(diào)用,說(shuō)明self可以釋放,也就是上面的兩種block不會(huì)造成循環(huán)引用。
再來(lái)看看我們自定義的block:類(lèi)函數(shù)的block和單例函數(shù)的block
首先我們定義一個(gè)新的類(lèi)叫User,里面定義了一個(gè)+方法,然后還是在VC2中調(diào)用。
@interface User ()
@end
+ (void)method1:(void (^)(void)) block {
block();
}
- (void)viewDidLoad {
[super viewDidLoad];
[User method1:^{
NSLog(@"self = %@",self);
}];
}
pop之后的打印結(jié)果:
**2016-09-23 15:36:06.575382 BlockTest5[1768:664071] self = <VC2: 0x100205190>**
**2016-09-23 15:36:07.750706 BlockTest5[1768:664071] vc****釋放了**
因?yàn)閂C2和User這個(gè)類(lèi)不存在持有關(guān)系,即使block持有了VC2,在block之行完畢之后,block會(huì)自動(dòng)釋放VC2的引用,這個(gè)跟UIView 動(dòng)畫(huà)的block的一樣,不會(huì)造成循環(huán)引用。
再來(lái)看看單例會(huì)不會(huì)造成循環(huán)引用
+ (User *)sharedInstance {
static User *_sharedInstance = nil;
static dispatch_once_t oncePredicate;
dispatch_once(&oncePredicate, ^{
_sharedInstance = [[User alloc] init];
});
return _sharedInstance;
}
- (void)method:(void (^)(void)) block {
block();
}
- (void)viewDidLoad {
[super viewDidLoad];
[[User sharedInstance] method:^{
NSLog(@"self = %@",self);
}];
pop之后的打印結(jié)果:
**2016-09-23 15:48:39.269606 BlockTest5[1774:666370] self = <VC2: 0x1004175e0>**
**2016-09-23 15:48:40.482220 BlockTest5[1774:666370] vc****釋放了**
}
雖然單例在生成之后不會(huì)被釋放,但是單例并沒(méi)有引用block,即使block引用了VC2,但是block在執(zhí)行完畢之后,會(huì)釋放掉VC2的引用,所以不會(huì)造成循環(huán)引用。
我們修改一下,上面的代碼,讓單例強(qiáng)引用block。
typedef void (^block) (void);
@interface User ()
@property (nonatomic, strong) block blk;
@end
- (void)method:(void (^)(void)) block {
self.blk = block;
block();
}
pop之后的打印結(jié)果:
**2016-09-23 15:54:05.826783 BlockTest5[1777:667593] self = <VC2: 0x1003126f0>**
從打印結(jié)果中,我們可以看出VC2的dealloc方法并沒(méi)有被調(diào)用,說(shuō)明出現(xiàn)了循環(huán)引用。
因?yàn)樵谶@種情況下,單例引用了block,block引用了VC2,而單例在程序運(yùn)行中不會(huì)被釋放,所以block也不會(huì)被釋放,所以VC2也不會(huì)被釋放。