To be honest, I am glad that guy likes my moment massage. Strange friend (real friend hopefully) 說實話，這個同學點贊了，我很開心。
This is the copy from an article I saw today: 婚姻就是犧牲激情換取安穩。婚姻是個復雜的東西，愛情則要純粹的多。婚姻一直和財產有著密切的關系，因此屬于律法和道德的范疇。但愛情既跟律法無關，也跟道德無關。最深的欲望，其實很難用道德去評價。I look forward love but not marriage, and now I got the reason after the passage help me distinguish love from marriage.
Finally finish the introduction of the project in English. But got to get up early to finish the homework.
Two roommates from EF dorm came to visit me this noon. Grad to see them. Thank her for caring about the business of the club. I have been try hard not to disturb her. It is very kind of her to talk about it with me. They bet that I didn't keep going to bed early and getting up early only because my facial skin. So sad... 兩個ef的舍友來西苑吃飯，順便來找我。她們在ef過上了健康安詳的空巢老人生活，每天竟然十二點熄燈七點起床，還去跑步散步。還是那么會吹水，那么搞笑。謝謝對床還在關心社團的事。竟然一看我臉的皮膚就知道我沒堅持早睡早起:-(。
“怕輸”所以不創新。嗯，大學還在于不斷嘗試創新。像跳石一樣，看準了，敢敢跳。
Kind of surprised when I saw the list of the needy students(including me) in front of the elevator. Though it was put in public till Tuesday. It is kind of strange and embarrassing. I think it is ok to public it online. But here the place is so frequent-visited. Not a perfect way~看到家庭經濟困難學生的名單公布在電梯口，感覺有點突兀，之前似乎有公布在辦公自動化，想看便打開文件看。而直接公布在樓梯口，不管關不關心這件事，幾乎整層樓的同學等電梯時都可以看到。一點點難為情。就像在大學把全班的學業成績都公開一樣。
I feel difficult to communicate with them...I think it is that they don't really respect me as the leader. Since I didn't act as a leader.大家對我是不是很不滿呢……我提出問題是對事不對人，可能他們也是對事不對人, I take it too seriously。
課堂筆記：
兒童文學講M?a?ti?l?da，有電影版，b站有，挺好看的。
這是個富有爭議的兒童故事。很有趣，電影版中的故事情節很刺激。爸爸的臺詞：I am big, you are little. I am right, you are wrong.
1. 在故事里面，通常壞人變好。然而matilda的父母還有校長并沒有變好。
故事里面通常有對比，皇上平民，最好的和最壞的。壞的最后變好，跟之前成對比，體現forgiveness。但這個故事重點是小孩kicking back大人。作者這樣寫可能是為了反傳統or 個人believing system
2. 成人可以看出其中的諷刺，兒童呢？3. matilda的角色：inbetween 特殊兒童和普通兒童（智力超人，孩子般表達情緒）給孩子啟發：要讀書才能像matilda一樣打敗大人。還有when need help, go ask for help or try to get through it.
4. 父親排斥matilda看書，說她是mistake，但又讓她family time一起看電視，因為那樣才像一家人。他心中的理想家庭是？
5.強膠水等的惡作劇會不會對其他小孩有壞影響？
不會：故事有說明惡作劇的糟糕結果，比如多難處理，父母多難為；另外，乖小孩自然不敢模仿，而調皮的小孩不缺這幾個ideas；更重要的是，這本書可以提供和小孩、學生互動交流的機會，一起談論matilda的行為，了解孩子的想法并進行引導。
會：孩子喜歡模仿，不懂事。
6. 這個故事MAKE fun of people in power, questioning and challenging the ?authority, 讓人想起中國美猴王，還有美國的政客漫畫。
7.not physical child in the pictures，故事圖片中小孩體型極其小。
body:
confining(for safe, control of the body) and soiling(大人認為body mean to be clean, 小孩沒做到會被懲罰，女主也利用這個點報復大人，比如倒水到成人校長身上)
contrast between the body of the principle and the children(control of their body)映射 大人給小孩的physical experience, physical pain
7. Matilda was called person instead of child.
subvert-subvertive 顛覆性
8. education
?bad parents: ?too much\\little
?self-education
?enabling---librarian
?social control--Trunchbull
?good teacher---Miss Honey
