提綱參考答案
1. Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do youagree or disagree?
此題目實際上由兩個部分構成（構成了因果關系），請注意兩個部分都要回應。不上傳提綱，直接上傳一篇考官范文，請認真參考修改。這個文章最簡單的寫法就是像下面的范文一樣每一個部分各自分開回應，兩個部分的立場是各自自由的。
Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of wild animals because we humans have no need for them. I completely disagree with this point of view.
In my opinion, it is absurd to argue that wild animals have no place in the 21st century. I do not believe that planet Earth exists only for the benefit of humans, and there is nothing special about this particular century that means that we suddenly have the right to allow or encourage the extinction of any species. Furthermore, there is no compelling reason why we should let animals die out. We do not need to exploit or destroy every last square metre of land in order to feed or accommodate the world’s population. There is plenty of room for us to exist side by side with wild animals, and this should be our aim.
I also disagree with the idea that protecting animals is a waste of resources. It is usually the protection of natural habitats that ensures the survival of wild animals, and most scientists agree that these habitats are also crucial for human survival. For example,rainforests produce oxygen, absorb carbon dioxide and stabilise the Earth’s climate. If we destroyed these areas, the costs of managing the resulting changes to our planet would far outweigh the costs of conservation. By protecting wild animals and their habitats, we maintain the natural balance of all life on Earth.
In conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect them.
2. Some people think that the development of technology makes our life complex, and the solution is for everyone to accept a simpler life without using technology. To what extent do you agree or disagree? (2017.2.18日考題)
上面這個題目也是由兩個部分組成。在寫作的時候，我的立場會是我同意科技給我們的生活帶來的一些復雜的東西，但是我不同意我們應該停止使用科技（請注意兩個立場不是必須一致的）。
再給一個例子
Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals; during festival periods, people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? （很明顯這個題目也是由兩個部分組成）
Some people argue that we no longer remember the original meaning of festivals, and that most of us treat them as opportunities to have fun. While I agree that enjoyment seems to be the priority during festival times, I do not agree that people have forgotten what these festivals mean. (這是文章的開頭段，大家關鍵是要理解兩個部分都要回應)
